United States, January 24 – A top American fluid-dynamics boffin says that new, larger wind turbines now going into service are going to have to be placed much further apart – which will have serious implications for the amount of energy produced by wind farms of the future.

The latest wind farms now going into service use huge turbines with rotor diameters in the 100m range, expected to offer large outputs. But according to engineering professor and fluid dynamics expert Charles Meneveau of Johns Hopkins University, there’s a problem.

“The early experience is that they are producing less power than expected,” says Meneveau. “Some of these projects are underperforming.”

The prof, who has investigated air flow in wind farms for years, looked into the matter of the underperforming monster turbines along with Johan Meyers of the Katholieke Universiteit Leuven in Belgium.

“I believe our results are quite robust,” says Meneveau. “They indicate that large wind farm operators are going to have to space their turbines farther apart.”

Big turbines are at the moment generally installed about seven rotor diameters apart, but Meneveau and Meyers say that the optimum spacing is actually 15 diameters, slightly more than twice as far apart.

If this plan were followed, a wind farm covering a given area would only be able to install a quarter of the number of turbines it could have under today’s planning assumptions. Though the amount of energy generated per turbine would be the best possible, it seems unlikely that such efficiency gains could possibly compensate for the cut in numbers.

On the other hand, if windfarms continue to be constructed with turbines crowded more closely together, they will continue to produce less electricity than their builders had expected.

Overall the professor’s research would appear to mean that projected output figures for large new windfarms – for instance the UK’s planned, enormous offshore Round 3 facilities, expected to be built in the North Sea from 2015 – will have to be revised downwards one way or another.

Advertisements

Does it Pay to Convert Your Business Lighting to LED?

Yes. Whether your business uses florescent, recessed, high pressure sodium or incandescent bulbs, your business can enjoy significant energy savings by converting to LED. Until recently, LEDs were limited to single-bulb use in products such as pen lights and outdoor Christmas lights. Today’s LED bulbs are available with standard bases which fit common commercial light fixtures.

retrofitsLED retrofits are ideal replacement lighting for fluorescent tubes, recessed lamps and exterior fixtures including street, parking, signage and canopy lighting. The benefits are:

Lower Energy Costs – LED bulbs use 2-10 watts of electricity

Longer Long – LED bulbs last as long as 50,000 hours

Lower Maintenance – reduced bulb and ballast replacement

Click here for link to web page with more retrofit information

Ok, so we know a retrofit to LED bulbs will significantly reduce your energy use and that bulbs will last many times longer than incandescent or fluorescent. Your actual dollar amount of savings is based on a few factors unique to your location:

* The type and number of bulbs currently being used
* The Daily Operating Hours of your business
* Your local electricity rate

To prepare your free analysis and quote, please list the fixtures and bulbs to be replaced and have a copy of your recent electric bill nearby. Then download the FREE LED Savings Calculator. Call us at 860-693-0257 with questions.

For projects retrofitting 75 or more fixtures, Global Capital Services, LLC can assist in arranging lease-to-own financing which is structured so that the annual cash savings will cover most, if not all, of the lease payments. Then, after the repayment terms available from 2 to 4 years, your company enjoys all of the projected savings from the retrofit project.